<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Bimmer Forums - BMW Community</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bimmerforums.org/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bimmerforums.org</link>
	<description>How to, Do-it-yourselfs, and help with your BMW</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:46:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fan Delete Mod in BMW 3 Series E36 by e46 led</title>
		<link>http://bimmerforums.org/e36/fan-delete-mod-in-bmw-3-series-e36.html/comment-page-1#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>e46 led</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bimmerforums.org/e36/fan-delete-mod-in-bmw-3-series-e36/#comment-196</guid>
		<description>Great! all of us agree with something! What are your own thoughts on the M? BMW whored out M just like Mercedes did with AMG. Whatever occured to producing autos fast that were worth a darn? What person would like a 4500lb pig with 500 hp?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great! all of us agree with something! What are your own thoughts on the M? BMW whored out M just like Mercedes did with AMG. Whatever occured to producing autos fast that were worth a darn? What person would like a 4500lb pig with 500 hp?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which suspension mods for BMW M3 (E90) by e46 led</title>
		<link>http://bimmerforums.org/e90-m3/which-suspension-mods-for-bmw-m3-e90.html/comment-page-1#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>e46 led</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bimmerforums.org/e90-m3/which-suspension-mods-for-bmw-m3-e90.html#comment-195</guid>
		<description>When the 1 series came out, I didn&#039;t enjoy it. Perhaps if it ended up being closer to what the 2002 was and was (much) lighter, less expensive, and had a very great I4 (turboed or not, I don&#039;t care) then I would like it greater, but whatever. What side tracked me further was the expected M unit that might rationally be called the M1. I thought that it just couldn&#039;t be proper to compare and contrast the two M1s. Then again, since the 1 series came out in the US, the M division has created 2 SUVs that don&#039;t even come with a manual. The Porsche Cayenne has one, was it that hard? Anyways, times are changing so go on and call it an M1. More desirable to manufacture a respectable, or possibly remarkable, car rather than not come up with it whatsoever just due to the fact a mess of fanboys would get harmed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the 1 series came out, I didn&#8217;t enjoy it. Perhaps if it ended up being closer to what the 2002 was and was (much) lighter, less expensive, and had a very great I4 (turboed or not, I don&#8217;t care) then I would like it greater, but whatever. What side tracked me further was the expected M unit that might rationally be called the M1. I thought that it just couldn&#8217;t be proper to compare and contrast the two M1s. Then again, since the 1 series came out in the US, the M division has created 2 SUVs that don&#8217;t even come with a manual. The Porsche Cayenne has one, was it that hard? Anyways, times are changing so go on and call it an M1. More desirable to manufacture a respectable, or possibly remarkable, car rather than not come up with it whatsoever just due to the fact a mess of fanboys would get harmed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Suspension Overhaul FAQ by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://bimmerforums.org/e36/suspension-overhaul-faq.html/comment-page-1#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bimmerforums.org/e36/suspension-overhaul-faq.html#comment-155</guid>
		<description>Wow great write up, this should come in handy this summer when I do my suspension overhaul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow great write up, this should come in handy this summer when I do my suspension overhaul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Suspension Overhaul FAQ by Taariq</title>
		<link>http://bimmerforums.org/e36/suspension-overhaul-faq.html/comment-page-1#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>Taariq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bimmerforums.org/e36/suspension-overhaul-faq.html#comment-154</guid>
		<description>One thing I&#039;m confused about is the two mentions of Trailing Arm Bushings related to the rear axle. One is mentioned as RTAB, and one merely &quot;Rear Trailing Arm Bushing&quot;. Should I change both?

On another note, I wanted to change my front LCABs and so I ordered 33-32-1-136-311, but that&#039;s actually something completely different! eEuroparts.com lists it as &quot;trailing arm bushing (lower)&quot; for the rear! Instead I need 31-12-9-059-288 for my front LCABs.

So now I need to figure out what the hell I need to do my RTABs. Do I need 33-32-6-770-786? eEuroparts.com list that as &quot;Trailing Arm Bushing (upper)&quot; for the rear.

The other thing I ordered -- 33-32-1-097-009 -- I have no idea what it&#039;s for! &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rogueengineering.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=CTGY&amp;Category_Code=RTAB&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Rogue Engineering show it as the 1995 E36 RTAB&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing I&#8217;m confused about is the two mentions of Trailing Arm Bushings related to the rear axle. One is mentioned as RTAB, and one merely &quot;Rear Trailing Arm Bushing&quot;. Should I change both?</p>
<p>On another note, I wanted to change my front LCABs and so I ordered 33-32-1-136-311, but that&#8217;s actually something completely different! eEuroparts.com lists it as &quot;trailing arm bushing (lower)&quot; for the rear! Instead I need 31-12-9-059-288 for my front LCABs.</p>
<p>So now I need to figure out what the hell I need to do my RTABs. Do I need 33-32-6-770-786? eEuroparts.com list that as &quot;Trailing Arm Bushing (upper)&quot; for the rear.</p>
<p>The other thing I ordered &#8212; 33-32-1-097-009 &#8212; I have no idea what it&#8217;s for! <a href="http://www.rogueengineering.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=CTGY&amp;Category_Code=RTAB" rel="nofollow">Rogue Engineering show it as the 1995 E36 RTAB</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Suspension Overhaul FAQ by Psyche</title>
		<link>http://bimmerforums.org/e36/suspension-overhaul-faq.html/comment-page-1#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>Psyche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bimmerforums.org/e36/suspension-overhaul-faq.html#comment-153</guid>
		<description>That would be handy advice, as well as a more detailed explanation on springs, spring rates, and what they do. I&#039;ll use the all-powerful Google and see what can be dug up. Vorshlag is also attempting to compile a list as well it seems... everybody send them your used OE springs! &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vorshlag.com/tech_springrates.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.vorshlag.com/tech_springrates.php&lt;/a&gt;


	
I am actually currently in the process of compiling just such a list. From DDM to Motion. Part of the aftermarket compilation (along with bushings, swaybars, et cetera...). Trying to pick up rides in as many different sort of individual setups as I can... I hate just regurgitating information without verifying it myself.


	
Thanks for the review. Yes... I am currently facing the same problem of simply not understanding more than the fairly simply basics of shock valving. I know a couple guys who can explain a bit more though, I might see if I can have them chime in. Or explain it down to my level. 


	
Definitely is possible. I have included a section for just such more in-depth dissertation (technical discussions), I will add it to my list of things to write. The guide is trying to cater to the novice user as well as the sophisticated and intermediate user. Being able to separate initial purchase maintenance questions from coilover corner balancing questions is important (and a function of organization, not content sophistication).


	
Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would be handy advice, as well as a more detailed explanation on springs, spring rates, and what they do. I&#8217;ll use the all-powerful Google and see what can be dug up. Vorshlag is also attempting to compile a list as well it seems&#8230; everybody send them your used OE springs! <a href="http://www.vorshlag.com/tech_springrates.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.vorshlag.com/tech_springrates.php</a></p>
<p>I am actually currently in the process of compiling just such a list. From DDM to Motion. Part of the aftermarket compilation (along with bushings, swaybars, et cetera&#8230;). Trying to pick up rides in as many different sort of individual setups as I can&#8230; I hate just regurgitating information without verifying it myself.</p>
<p>Thanks for the review. Yes&#8230; I am currently facing the same problem of simply not understanding more than the fairly simply basics of shock valving. I know a couple guys who can explain a bit more though, I might see if I can have them chime in. Or explain it down to my level. </p>
<p>Definitely is possible. I have included a section for just such more in-depth dissertation (technical discussions), I will add it to my list of things to write. The guide is trying to cater to the novice user as well as the sophisticated and intermediate user. Being able to separate initial purchase maintenance questions from coilover corner balancing questions is important (and a function of organization, not content sophistication).</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Suspension Overhaul FAQ by Yasunari</title>
		<link>http://bimmerforums.org/e36/suspension-overhaul-faq.html/comment-page-1#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>Yasunari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bimmerforums.org/e36/suspension-overhaul-faq.html#comment-152</guid>
		<description>+1 on stickied. Awesome very informative thread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1 on stickied. Awesome very informative thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Suspension Overhaul FAQ by Yasuo</title>
		<link>http://bimmerforums.org/e36/suspension-overhaul-faq.html/comment-page-1#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Yasuo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bimmerforums.org/e36/suspension-overhaul-faq.html#comment-151</guid>
		<description>Very well done Spoonman!  You&#039;ve done a great job here.  Thanks for the link in the Definitive Alignment thread, these subjects go hand in hand.  

Years ago (on DTM Power IIRC) there was a table of spring rates of the popular aftermarket spring choices for E36, if you could find that I think it would be helpful.  

Also, I wonder if actually giving advice about some of the tried and true E36 Coilover systems (Koni/GC, PSS9s, ASTs, etc) may be helpful to reduce the question...&quot;how are xyz coilovers&quot;.   

From my experience, Koni SA shocks and struts have comfortable compression damping on the street, and perform well up to about 500-550# spring rates.  I just switched to the PSS9 kit (dampers only using GC coils), and the compression is noticeably stiffer, but they can control significantly higher spring rates, which where Im creeping toward.  Also, I know there are fundamental differences between twin tube and monotube (monotube have higher gas pressures, and less hysteresis), but I don&#039;t know enough about the differences to be really knowledgeable.  Maybe you can shed some light on that too.

Also, maybe you are willing to go into suspension theory of the E36 chassis.  I don&#039;t know if anyone has yet explained the concept of keeping the front end stiff with lots of static neg camber, and running the rear softer to allow for a nice dynamic camber curve.  Also, the concept of tuning with sway bars, spring rates, and shock damping.  You think those things are realistic to tackle?

Oh yeah, this should be stickied in the new Suspension Forum!   (....and the Alignment Guide )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well done Spoonman!  You&#8217;ve done a great job here.  Thanks for the link in the Definitive Alignment thread, these subjects go hand in hand.  </p>
<p>Years ago (on DTM Power IIRC) there was a table of spring rates of the popular aftermarket spring choices for E36, if you could find that I think it would be helpful.  </p>
<p>Also, I wonder if actually giving advice about some of the tried and true E36 Coilover systems (Koni/GC, PSS9s, ASTs, etc) may be helpful to reduce the question&#8230;&quot;how are xyz coilovers&quot;.   </p>
<p>From my experience, Koni SA shocks and struts have comfortable compression damping on the street, and perform well up to about 500-550# spring rates.  I just switched to the PSS9 kit (dampers only using GC coils), and the compression is noticeably stiffer, but they can control significantly higher spring rates, which where Im creeping toward.  Also, I know there are fundamental differences between twin tube and monotube (monotube have higher gas pressures, and less hysteresis), but I don&#8217;t know enough about the differences to be really knowledgeable.  Maybe you can shed some light on that too.</p>
<p>Also, maybe you are willing to go into suspension theory of the E36 chassis.  I don&#8217;t know if anyone has yet explained the concept of keeping the front end stiff with lots of static neg camber, and running the rear softer to allow for a nice dynamic camber curve.  Also, the concept of tuning with sway bars, spring rates, and shock damping.  You think those things are realistic to tackle?</p>
<p>Oh yeah, this should be stickied in the new Suspension Forum!   (&#8230;.and the Alignment Guide )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Suspension Overhaul FAQ by Page</title>
		<link>http://bimmerforums.org/e36/suspension-overhaul-faq.html/comment-page-1#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>Page</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bimmerforums.org/e36/suspension-overhaul-faq.html#comment-150</guid>
		<description>Bumping this thread due to substantial content changes. Here are the hilights:

- Roughly twice the information as the last version.
- Post has been restructured, moved to an external editor, and fully spellchecked (apologies for misspellings previously).
- More detailed information on a variety of components (front control arms, spring hats, etc...).
- Table of Contents added (when your post needs a table of contents, you need to get a life  )
- Most everything has been re-worded in the interest of objectivity, accuracy, and brevity.
- Added motion ratios for those of you really serious about suspension calculations.
- Better layout to all component entries providing a description of what it is, where it attaches, and often how it fails.


As always, if anything is not to your liking feel free to contact me about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bumping this thread due to substantial content changes. Here are the hilights:</p>
<p>- Roughly twice the information as the last version.<br />
- Post has been restructured, moved to an external editor, and fully spellchecked (apologies for misspellings previously).<br />
- More detailed information on a variety of components (front control arms, spring hats, etc&#8230;).<br />
- Table of Contents added (when your post needs a table of contents, you need to get a life  )<br />
- Most everything has been re-worded in the interest of objectivity, accuracy, and brevity.<br />
- Added motion ratios for those of you really serious about suspension calculations.<br />
- Better layout to all component entries providing a description of what it is, where it attaches, and often how it fails.</p>
<p>As always, if anything is not to your liking feel free to contact me about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Suspension Overhaul FAQ by Pahana</title>
		<link>http://bimmerforums.org/e36/suspension-overhaul-faq.html/comment-page-1#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>Pahana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bimmerforums.org/e36/suspension-overhaul-faq.html#comment-149</guid>
		<description>Lovely thread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lovely thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Suspension Overhaul FAQ by Bisma</title>
		<link>http://bimmerforums.org/e36/suspension-overhaul-faq.html/comment-page-1#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Bisma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bimmerforums.org/e36/suspension-overhaul-faq.html#comment-148</guid>
		<description>Good thread.  Thanks for putting it together.

Doug</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thread.  Thanks for putting it together.</p>
<p>Doug</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
